Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
The brand new Jersey Supreme Court is made up of seven justices. Although it absolutely was originally founded in 1776 during the American Revolution, it didn't consider a transparent form until the New Jersey Constitution of 1844. In contrast to lots of other state supreme courts, it does not hold unique jurisdiction over any legal matters. The Court may possibly review an appeal from a lower court inside of a case involving the death penalty, a constitutional question, redistricting, or perhaps a dissent by an appellate justice.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees utilize.
Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The a good amount of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made obvious that police is free to take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-subject duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
13. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is recognized and also the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it's the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct is not enough however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful way. Read more
Only a few years back, searching for case precedent was a tricky and time consuming activity, demanding men and women to search through print copies of case law, or to buy access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case regulation search choices, and plenty of sources offer free access to case legislation.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support with the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. Read more
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents with the boy or Woman tend not to approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they can Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or check here finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it correct towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established by the government.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to inside the state court, for the same level.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.